As years pass, my opinions on some things change. I may even change certain ways I train or coach, and make no apologies for implementing these changes when new information comes to light that would benefit my athletes.
Generally, changes have been brought in to improve efficiency, effectiveness, scalability or safety. Sometimes changes were required based on where training was being held, or whom I was dealing with. Although progress may need to be redefined, the mission remains the same.
A frog in a well only sees the world from the perspective provided by a small hole.
Sometime ago a trainer told me all they needed in this occupation was “a standardized programming model and an anatomy textbook.” He was proud of the fact that he never received instruction in specialized equipment.
In my opinion, that is placing significant limitations on oneself, potentially robs clients of benefits gained from the proper use of specialized equipment, while increasing potential risks.
Minimally, the trainer has decided to remain at entry level, and the frog in the well.
A longtime client on extended travel recently told me that based on her observations at six different gyms good trainers are uncommon. She went so far as to say “I am so glad I am not a client of these trainers” I wasn’t her first trainer (I was her fourth), so she has a decent comparison group.
Heresy: It is cases like these that make me think that trainer certifications are overrated.
Entry level certification largely means a person passed a written exam. Among other topics the exams generally cover anatomy and physiology and exercise technique. The depth varies per agency and some tests are easily passable. Even the harder exams don’t automatically mean a person can apply, or even recall fundamental material from the course. They may not have the slightest idea of how to adjust exercises for an individual, and may never have even trained themselves.
Would entry-level personal training certifications matter more if they were harder to obtain? I believe a combination of academics (Were you tested on your knowledge?), performance (Do you even lift?) and coaching/teaching ability (Can you teach someone unlike you?) should be required.
Many trainers tend to forget that Personal Trainer Certifications are a fairly new thing. We also lose sight of the fact that many people on the gym floor watch what we do very carefully. That can be a good or bad thing.
While the Overhead Squat Assessment uses a dowel or PVC pipe, the above image is similar to the position the screen wants you to obtain. The Overhead squat happens to be one of the more difficult bilateral squat variations, but is necessary for Olympic lifting.
Heresy: I’ve removed the Overhead Squat Assessment (a prominent part of both the NASM Corrective Exercise Specialist and the Functional Movement Screen) for several reasons.
1) Outside of those previously well trained in the Olympic lifts, most people cannot do it very well.
2) Those with Olympic Weightlifting training do not perform the Overhead Squat like the screen demands.
3) It’s not a natural movement, and certainly not natural for beginners or the sedentary. Many people have issues simply figuring out Squat from Sit and from Hinge to Bend Over. Like training, the screen should meet you where you are.
4) Load exposes you. You could have a perfectly fine looking Overhead Squat with a PVC pipe in your hands, and fold into human origami when load is imposed.
Heresy: I’ve also reduced mobility work down to just a few minutes (if needed), and rarely use the foam roller.
Further, I’ve removed the term Dysfunction from my Coaching vocabulary except as applied to lifting performance. I never liked the context the word was often used and don’t believe its within my professional scope of practice to call something a dysfunction, when it could be a variation of normal, or something else entirely.
1) If you’re new to exercise, we focus on what you can do, instead of me nitpicking at all the things you can’t do.
2) If you are experienced in training, we look for makes you better and inches you closer to your goal. My job as a Strength Coach involves making the good, better.
3) Can things be cued to achieve the desired movement? Do I necessarily need to regress?
4) If it’s beyond that, or involves pain then the Dr they go. This doesn’t mean training has completely stopped as I can often work other parts of the body.